Schumann's Cleveland Pages archives

This archive article is selected from The Cleveland Pages, the city's only weekly independent journal of politics and opinion on the Internet. Find out all about the Cleveland Pages here, or check out the current issue.

The Free Times, in an article no longer online, called Cleveland Pages "Spicily independent... in the best tradition of citizen-journalist."

The Cleveland Pages is a somewhat-weekly commentary on what's new and why it's all happening in Cleveland and Cuyahoga County. If what you read here is upsetting, you might prefer this simple-minded happy-talk instead.

Bookmark the Cleveland Pages at http://re.cleveland.oh.us. Bookmark this issue at http://re.cleveland.oh.us/archives/20000428.html.

A Cleveland Pages archive search will be available soon... Meanwhile, skip to the flat-file archive list! And read an overview of who's putting this thing out and what it's about.

Wake Up! (28 April 2000)


Sorry about the last couple of weeks

Some regular Cleveland Pages correspondents have given me their usual load about skipping three weeks worth of updates. I suppose that's fair ("something new every Friday!") but, well, there are the deadlines you get paid for and the deadlines you don't get paid for. Guess which one this is. Sometimes "act locally" translates as "make sure the mortgage check clears."

That's true about any form of activism, Cleveland Pages included. A typical person who has a job and family, or who is working on them, doesn't have much time or energy left over to change the world, or even one city.

On the other hand, someone who lacks those commitments has a hard time being taken seriously. You can't win, it seems.

Recent national events provide a nice example of what I mean by this.

The Media's Pre-Emptive Strike

The national media conduits enjoyed their opportunity to lambast and ridicule those who gathered in protest of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank meetings in DC this month. Apparently taken unawares by the startling volume and strength of protests at last year's conference of the World Trade Organization (WTO) in Seattle, the opinion-makers this time were as well prepared as the riot police. In some cases, the warm-up invective started days early!

National Journal editor Michael Kelly, to choose just one of the IMF-basher-bashers, griped in a Washington Post op-ed that targeting debt relief for poor countries somehow cheapened those honest, good demonstrations in the 1960s for Black voting rights, speaking specifically of Martin Luther King's 1963 March on Washington. Kelly told of his vague uneasiness at the "presumption" that his own participation in later protests against the Vietnam war "occupied anything like the same moral plane." And then, to pile guilt on top of guilt, he attacked those IMF demonstrations as "an imitation of an imitation of a form of politics that was once reserved for life and death."

It was good rhetoric, although I've read better. But debt relief is a matter of life and death for the people affected. Poorer countries do without sanitation, immunization, and other public health projects to meet payments on loans backing projects that were questionable to begin with. Some African countries have reduced their public education spending similarly. That much is obvious, and well documented.

Hardly any mainstream media even mentioned the substance of anti-IMF complaints. The paragraph right above this one may have delivered more such information than you've seen on all TV networks combined. It's an old tactic: zoom the cameras in on the wackiest-looking protestors, but don't quote anyone who might sound coherent.

Media condescension directed towards IMF demonstrators for being young, white, and privileged is puzzling. That tone might have sounded pretty good against the young, white, and privileged northern college students who participated in Mississippi's "Freedom Summer" movement in 1964. Would people like Michael Kelly feel better if today's protestors received the treatment of Schwerner, Goodman, and Chaney? Would that have made the IMF protests honest and meaningful?

Normally I wouldn't try to put words in Dr. King's mouth, or attempt to speak for anyone else. I'll make an exception since Kelly opened the door by invoking King's name in his rant. It seems that moderating multilateral debt levels would be something King would have supported in the name of fairness to the world's poor.

Back to Cleveland

I mention this article at all not because it has anything particularly to do with Cleveland. I use it as an example of the sort of wiser-than-thou thinking that permeates the mainstream media. Those a bit younger than I (now 34, not much younger than Michael Kelly) were vilified for supposedly being too wrapped up in consumer and career pursuits, not attuned to the needs of others, and just too narrow-minded.

Now that some people a little younger in turn than that cohort have turned to organized nonviolence in the face of powerful international institutions, their elders and mine aren't satisfied: we're not sincere enough, the causes aren't glorious enough, the rhetoric isn't deep enough. It's as if the Baby Boomer critics are embarrassed about having had ideals long ago. More likely, though, they're more ashamed of having lost them.

Which reminds me of a story.

It was about three years after I'd graduated from college, gotten married, and mostly busied myself with buying a house and functioning in a corporate job. I had "gone private" for a while; in retrospect, that was the right thing to do, because I do need to have a place to live and my little people about me. Our first child, Adele, was about three months old.

Anyway, at this meeting, Ione Biggs made an appropriate fuss over the baby. Then she told me, in her kind but authoritative way, "Now you know how important it is to make this a better world."

Ione Biggs never gives a lecture when a well-chosen reference to one's own experience will do. It was her way of chiding me for having been out of touch with the complex community of little local movements in and around Cleveland.

But life is like that. There's a time to take care of your own family and a time to consider the larger family. From one year to the next, priorities emerge, environments change, and events either reassure one or sound alarms. Other people's expectations are for other people!

Protest by Proxy

Admittedly, the teens and twentysomethings who appeared most visibly at those IMF protests were there, perhaps in part, because it was a school break or because their job pressures were modest. Why is that such a bad thing though? They march and chant in the place of like-minded people who couldn't get a babysitter or who couldn't afford to miss work. They bring their presence to bear for others who are too self-conscious or lacking in energy to do so.

Michael Kelly says he felt good about Martin Luther King's March on Washington, in August of 1963, when he was six years old, because he was helping his own mother handing out cups of lemonade to the marchers on their street.

I hope my son Ben, now not quite six, feels the same way about this spring's march to the Cleveland Clinic. Because his own father was there, holding his hand all the way from Wade Park to Carnegie and snapping pictures with the free hand. But more importantly because we live in a corporate age, so we all need to develop ways to overcome what Rabbi Michael Lerner (from the magazine Tikkun) calls "surplus powerlessness."

We're overwhelmed by governments and institutions. It seems that every community endeavor is about profit-making or shilling for a poorly-hidden corporate agenda. Politicians call it "reasonable" and "realistic" when they trade off public interest for respectability at the next Growth Association gig.

For self-respect, for sanity, for democracy--people need to get out from under those institutions, even when they serve us too. Kindergarten is not too early to start on this lifetime pursuit. Most people never master it. Many never even start.

Labor's role

For this, we should thank organized labor, specifically those unions with more activist locals such as CWA and SEIU. Decades of negotiation and confrontation have yielded slow progress towards living wages, together with reasonable working hours. These unions help to fund, train, and support organizers who can devote more time and energy to causes that matter to working people and the poor.

Although fair-minded people will have minor or major differences with any union's political program, it's critical that those interests be represented. At their worst, the unions can be narrow-minded, selfish, and organized corruptly against their own members. Sometimes they can appear so overtly political that you might question where the membership is involved. But at their best, they teach the rest of us lessons about setting goals, managing resources, and sticking through hard times.

What it is

This spring's sustained picketing, the bus ride to Delaware, the ongoing command center at Broadway Methodist Church, the march on the Cleveland Clinic... these were good things, hopeful signs, totally aside from the very important questions of closing one hospital or selling another.

At this point in the city's history it's good to see people energized enough about anything to be heard and seen. Even if their protests are misguided. Even if they're wrong on the issues. And maybe even if the causes aren't, in some eyes, as noble as the epic struggles that happened in black-and-white and scratchy audio, before some of us were born.

Oh look. It's Friday morning and another client deadline is today.

Geez, Ione, I'm trying!


Rate this Cleveland Pages article!

Talk back to Schumann!

Your return mail (for replies)
Your real name (if you feel like giving it)
What's your opinion? Do you have a similar story?
Check here if you want to authorize Cleveland Pages to publish this comment in a future article.



Recent Cleveland Pages archives

  1. The real problem with race (25 May 2003)
  2. Yes to the Library, raspberries to the SEIU, and Voinovich is fair game (24 April 2003)
  3. Health and Human Services levy: vote NO, for the children! (17 April 2003)
  4. Convention Center: they can't be serious (11 January 2003)
  5. Hey! The system works! (26 December 2002)
  6. Halloween in the Hood (3 November 2002)
  7. Endorsements Again (25 October 2002)
  8. Callahan's Cleveland Wages Pages (22 September 2002)
  9. DUH! (Gateway out of money) (23 August 2002)
  10. Campbell's acclaim so far: two cheers (11 May 2002)
  11. Primary: Dettman, probably; definitely NO on Port Authority (05 May 2002)
  12. Cleveland Schools: Tremont, fifteen others to close (26 March 2002)
  13. Accounting for Accountability (20 March 2002)
  14. Ohio != Education (10 March 2002)
  15. Charter Schools Audit--Amazing Clarity (3 March 2002)
  16. Rehabilitating Jeffrey Johnson (20 January 2002)
  17. An Agenda for the New Mayor (4 January 2002)
  18. New Year's Resolutions for Everyone! (29 December 2001)
  19. Dirty Yellow Journalism at the Plain Dealer (20 September 2001)
  20. All I Wanted (27 August 2001)
  21. The Little Coverup (24 January 2001)
  22. A Little of Everything (14 December 2001)
  23. Last-minute endorsements (6 November 2000)
  24. I'm Going to Ralph (13 October 2000)
  25. "Airport Authority" a bad idea (22 September 2000)
  26. Ameritech: real competition needed (1 September 2000)
  27. Broken in[to]! (12 August 2000)
  28. Mad about Brady (31 July 2000)
  29. Straight talk from a developer (17 July 2000)
  30. Gateway sports leases: the not-so-fine print (7 July 2000)
  31. What's wrong with "Cleveland Tomorrow" (23 June 2000)
  32. Central Planning loses again: Gliatech heads east (2 June 2000)
  33. There was no Cleveland pages of 26 May 2000.
  34. Things on My Mind (19 May 2000)
  35. "... but sometimes, it really is raining!" (12 May 2000)
  36. Plain Dealer flubs Living Wage coverage (5 May 2000)
  37. Wake Up! (28 April 2000)
  38. There was no Cleveland pages for most of April 2000.
  39. This Week in Hospitals (31 March 2000)
  40. All Quiet on the Western Front (24 March 2000)
  41. Hospital Investigation Needed (17 March 2000)
  42. One-party rule continues (14 March 2000)
  43. Endorsements? Me? ...and why the city should shut down, now (7 March 2000)
  44. Ohio 13th House District: who wants it more? (18 February 2000)
  45. Cleveland's a joke. Get used to it (4 February 2000)
  46. Living Wage, on the merits, yes (28 January 2000)
  47. Reclaiming the city (24 January 2000)
  48. Crain's "gets it"! (7 January 2000)
  49. Person of the Year 1999 (31 December 1999)
  50. Baeppler quits (24 December 1999)
  51. News stories we'd like to see (13 December 1999)
  52. Crimes out of Nothing (29 November 1999)
  53. The trouble with Polensek (12 November 1999)
  54. Joanna Cagan on Sports Facilities (5 November 1999)
  55. Richard's Route (22 October 1999)
  56. Quiet on West 62nd Street (15 October 1999)
  57. Pine Needles vs. Democracy (8 October 1999)
  58. Who Owns the Rock Hall? (1 October 1999)
  59. Supertrapp: some signs of life at City Hall (24 September 1999)
  60. More "public participation" (16 September 1999)
  61. Unhooked from vouchers (7 September 1999)
  62. Good news about the Klan (20 August 1999)
  63. Another kind of respect (13 August 1999)
  64. Compromised Larkin? (6 August 1999)
  65. County Continues to Bail Out Gateway--this is news? (30 July 1999)
  66. Why are people poor? (23 July 1999)
  67. More on Reverse Commuter Blues (16 July 1999)
  68. North Coast Harbor project proposals: some sure things (9 July 1999)
  69. More happy talk, less Rokakis-bashing (18 June 1999)
  70. Scratch a Philadelphian, find a Clevelander (11 June 1999)
  71. ...and second prize is two weeks! (4 June 1999)
  72. There was no Cleveland pages of 28 May 1999.
  73. Chema admits it--Gateway's a loser (21 May 1999)
  74. Gateway broke; anyone surprised? (14 May 1999)
  75. Better than vouchers (7 May 1999)
  76. Help with income taxes! (30 April 1999)
  77. Remembering Perk (23 April 1999)
  78. Appraising Appraisals (16 April 1999)
  79. "Glory for Sale"--but who's buying? (9 April 1999)
  80. Reverse commuter blues (2 April 1999)
  81. A story about race (26 March 1999)
  82. How far we've come? (19 March 1999)
  83. There was no Cleveland pages of 12 March 1999.
  84. Cheap "Internet Journalism" at Channel 5 (5 March 1999)
  85. The Euclid Shuffle (26 February 1999)
  86. Sick of cheap reporting (19 February 1999)
  87. Equality in taxation (12 February 1999)
  88. Vice-President Voinovich? (5 February 1999)
  89. There was no Cleveland pages of 22 January 1999.
  90. Moran quits, and what's wrong with Council (22 January 1999)
  91. Everyday people, everyday traffic (15 January 1999)
  92. Jim WHO? (8 January 1999)
  93. The Cleveland Pages took a little holiday break.
  94. Judy on the Jennings (18 December 1998)
  95. There was no Cleveland pages of 11 December 1998.
  96. Coit Road shows some promise (4 December 1998)
  97. The Cleveland Pages took a long break. Hey, I don't get paid for this, okay?
  98. Merle Gordon on Ward 15 (6 November 1998)
  99. The new downtown plan hearing (30 October 1998)
  100. The new downtown plan, what's wrong (19 October 1998)
  101. Civic Vision 2000, the documents revealed! (16 October 1998)
  102. Civic Vision 2000, maybe some sunlight (9 October 1998)
  103. Another cut at the Civic Vision process (2 October 1998)
  104. Progress on vouchers (25 September 1998)
  105. Paying people to move away (18 September 1998)
  106. The payoff for Lerner? Nothing! (11 September 1998)
  107. Return of the Big Deal (5 September 1998)
  108. ¡Radio Libre Cleveland! (31 August 1998)
  109. The Public's Business (25 August 1998)
  110. BP moves out: the long term (14 August 1998)
  111. The Process Revolution (31 July 1998)
  112. STOP in the name of the law (24 July 1998)
  113. A new kind of redlining? (17 July 1998)
  114. Call your councilman--NOT! (27 February 1998)

This document's template was last modified
 on Wednesday, 09-Nov-2005 18:51:58 EST.
There is a new Cleveland Pages more or less every weekend.
The entire Cleveland Pages website is © 1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003
 by Mark W. Schumann, all rights reserved.
Copyrights belonging to others on individual items are noted.
Nobody else would take the credit or blame for these opinions anyway.

Go to the front page

Last validated 28 April 2000:

Go to Schumann Family welcome page [ Valid HTML 4.0! ] [ Valid CSS! ] [ Bobby Approved! ] [ Made with Cascading Style Sheets]

The W3C validator verifies that documents on this site conform to the Strict HTML 4.01 specification, which is a step towards consistency, accessibility, and interoperability.

Bobby checks for opportunities to improve access for users regardless of disabilities or special needs.