Schumann's Cleveland Pages archives

This archive article is selected from The Cleveland Pages, the city's only weekly independent journal of politics and opinion on the Internet. Find out all about the Cleveland Pages here, or check out the current issue.

The Free Times, in an article no longer online, called Cleveland Pages "Spicily independent... in the best tradition of citizen-journalist."

The Cleveland Pages is a somewhat-weekly commentary on what's new and why it's all happening in Cleveland and Cuyahoga County. If what you read here is upsetting, you might prefer this simple-minded happy-talk instead.

Bookmark the Cleveland Pages at http://re.cleveland.oh.us. Bookmark this issue at http://re.cleveland.oh.us/archives/20000204.html.

A Cleveland Pages archive search will be available soon... Meanwhile, skip to the flat-file archive list! And read an overview of who's putting this thing out and what it's about.

Cleveland's a Joke. Get Used to It.

Could they call this the "Duh" report?

A group called Cleveland Today (not to be confused with Cleveland Tomorrow) commissioned a survey to determine how people around the United States would feel about moving to Cleveland for a job. The survey was conducted in such a way that respondents wouldn't realize that the intent was to gather information about Cleveland; for example, Cleveland was always presented as just another city among a list of choices of where one might want to live.

Cleveland Today people admitted to being a bit taken aback by the results. "We were ranked last or close to last in nearly everything," said a Beachwood polling expert who oversaw the survey.

But nothing about that result should surprise anybody. The really good things about living in Cleveland get no national "ink," and the things that get hyped the most are available everywhere else.

What's good about living in Cleveland?

Cheap houses, really really cheap houses. Money left over from the mortgage, therefore, to buy cool things. Reasonable proximity to places like Pittsburgh, Toronto, Detroit, and Chicago if you stretch a little. Good clean, inexpensive water. A pace of life that's a little slower than New York City but more exciting than the admittedly lovely and beautiful Davenport, Iowa. Practically no traffic. Nice public facilities like the West Side Market, a fine zoo, and a library system that is absolutely incredible for the size of the city. Excellent parks just outside the city limits. One of the best places in the world to get sick.

But practically none of this stuff is in the national media. If organizations like Cleveland Today want to attract educated professional people to the area, why not run ads that talk about "a ten-minute drive to work and extra money at the end of the month"? Or "I moved to Cleveland and saved enough money on the house to send all my kids to the best private schools!" Or a testimonial from someone who flew her aging father to Cleveland for a heart transplant at the Clinic, and while there realized how much she hated her hour-long commute on the Jersey Turnpike. Or even, "my family is from New York and my husband's family is from Chicago. Now we can visit either, whenever we want, on a nine-hour drive or an hour flight."

What's not wrong

The Crain's article suggested that Cleveland's PR disadvantage comes from a relative lack of promotional spending compared to other cities. Gee--I don't suppose the real problems could be crime, poverty, infant mortality, and corruption, things that take a toll whether you see them or not.

Three suggestions

Suggestion one: Image is important, but so is reality.

You can advertise monkey droppings all you want, you can call them something else, you can get product placement on national media, but they're still monkey droppings. If Cleveland corporate leaders want to attract people to Cleveland, they're going to have to pay attention to the real, very serious problems that diminish our quality of life here. That means sustained efforts against racism, miseducation, political corruption, and underemployment. It means decreasing everyone's taxes by making freeloaders pay their fair share. And it means spending scarce public dollars on projects that actually benefit people who've made the commitment to live here.

Suggestion two: Play to our strengths.

Cleveland does not and never will have and appealing climate; does not and never will have the overwhelming energy of New York or Mexico City; does not and never will have the most exciting job market in North America; does not and never will have the best nightlife. These things belong to bigger and differently located cities. But we do have significant, less visible advantages that other cities lack and corporate types always want to overlook.

The Crain's article, for example, referred (in their words, paraphrasing the polling expert) "a frozen city that is home to rotund Browns fans and Drew Carey." As if that's a bad thing. Drew Carey has two, count them, two of the highest-rated network TV shows. People like watching him. They think he's funny. The old Dawg Pound was packed with people having fun eight Sundays a year.

Alarm bells should be going off now: the two things a business writer picks out to criticize about Cleveland's image are two things that people really like about Cleveland.

We're never going to be the most glamorous city. We're never going to have the biggest downtown or the greatest number of high-tech jobs. But we are nice people who genuinely enjoy life, make friends easily, and like to have fun. What could possibly be negative about that?

In that vein, let me propose some new slogans.

Suggestion three: remember who you're working for.

To the degree that promotional efforts and building projects are publicly funded, we have to demand that they benefit the public directly. That's just a form of paying attention to the customer.

Big downtown projects like the new Convention Center tend to get justified by complex rationalizations that just barely get around to a payoff for us, the funding source. The new center (over and above the huge investment in hotels and entertainment venues!) is required to bring in such-and-such number of meetings, which in turn will cause people to visit Cleveland, which in turn will cause people to have to stay overnight, which in turn will cause people to spend money at hotels and restaurants, which in turn will increase the profit base of those very few businesses that are closest to the center, which in turn will create some number of new jobs....

There was a time when people actually believed that wages were the return for an honest day's work. Now you have to do the honest day's work and support your employer's capital needs through taxes. That's not right. We shouldn't have to earn our paychecks twice.

And a taxpayer undertaking has to have more payoff than a vague perception that it might attract "better people" to Cleveland who in turn might buy some goods and services that might trickle down to the people who paid for it all to begin with.

So...

The concern over Cleveland's image is nice, but reality is more important. We are kidding ourselves if we think marketing the city as an East Coast megalopolis is going to work. And we need to remind the promoters who have their hands out for stadium and convention center funding who's writing the checks.

Nobody should be shocked that marketing Cleveland as a glamour destination isn't working. Let's try selling Cleveland for what it is. If people want Atlanta, New York, San Francisco, Chicago, Dallas... they know where to find them.


Rate this Cleveland Pages article!

Talk back to Schumann!

Your return mail (for replies)
Your real name (if you feel like giving it)
What's your opinion? How should Cleveland be "sold" to the outside world? Should it be "sold" at all?
Check here if you want to authorize Cleveland Pages to publish this comment in a future article.



Recent Cleveland Pages archives

  1. The real problem with race (25 May 2003)
  2. Yes to the Library, raspberries to the SEIU, and Voinovich is fair game (24 April 2003)
  3. Health and Human Services levy: vote NO, for the children! (17 April 2003)
  4. Convention Center: they can't be serious (11 January 2003)
  5. Hey! The system works! (26 December 2002)
  6. Halloween in the Hood (3 November 2002)
  7. Endorsements Again (25 October 2002)
  8. Callahan's Cleveland Wages Pages (22 September 2002)
  9. DUH! (Gateway out of money) (23 August 2002)
  10. Campbell's acclaim so far: two cheers (11 May 2002)
  11. Primary: Dettman, probably; definitely NO on Port Authority (05 May 2002)
  12. Cleveland Schools: Tremont, fifteen others to close (26 March 2002)
  13. Accounting for Accountability (20 March 2002)
  14. Ohio != Education (10 March 2002)
  15. Charter Schools Audit--Amazing Clarity (3 March 2002)
  16. Rehabilitating Jeffrey Johnson (20 January 2002)
  17. An Agenda for the New Mayor (4 January 2002)
  18. New Year's Resolutions for Everyone! (29 December 2001)
  19. Dirty Yellow Journalism at the Plain Dealer (20 September 2001)
  20. All I Wanted (27 August 2001)
  21. The Little Coverup (24 January 2001)
  22. A Little of Everything (14 December 2001)
  23. Last-minute endorsements (6 November 2000)
  24. I'm Going to Ralph (13 October 2000)
  25. "Airport Authority" a bad idea (22 September 2000)
  26. Ameritech: real competition needed (1 September 2000)
  27. Broken in[to]! (12 August 2000)
  28. Mad about Brady (31 July 2000)
  29. Straight talk from a developer (17 July 2000)
  30. Gateway sports leases: the not-so-fine print (7 July 2000)
  31. What's wrong with "Cleveland Tomorrow" (23 June 2000)
  32. Central Planning loses again: Gliatech heads east (2 June 2000)
  33. There was no Cleveland pages of 26 May 2000.
  34. Things on My Mind (19 May 2000)
  35. "... but sometimes, it really is raining!" (12 May 2000)
  36. Plain Dealer flubs Living Wage coverage (5 May 2000)
  37. Wake Up! (28 April 2000)
  38. There was no Cleveland pages for most of April 2000.
  39. This Week in Hospitals (31 March 2000)
  40. All Quiet on the Western Front (24 March 2000)
  41. Hospital Investigation Needed (17 March 2000)
  42. One-party rule continues (14 March 2000)
  43. Endorsements? Me? ...and why the city should shut down, now (7 March 2000)
  44. Ohio 13th House District: who wants it more? (18 February 2000)
  45. Cleveland's a joke. Get used to it (4 February 2000)
  46. Living Wage, on the merits, yes (28 January 2000)
  47. Reclaiming the city (24 January 2000)
  48. Crain's "gets it"! (7 January 2000)
  49. Person of the Year 1999 (31 December 1999)
  50. Baeppler quits (24 December 1999)
  51. News stories we'd like to see (13 December 1999)
  52. Crimes out of Nothing (29 November 1999)
  53. The trouble with Polensek (12 November 1999)
  54. Joanna Cagan on Sports Facilities (5 November 1999)
  55. Richard's Route (22 October 1999)
  56. Quiet on West 62nd Street (15 October 1999)
  57. Pine Needles vs. Democracy (8 October 1999)
  58. Who Owns the Rock Hall? (1 October 1999)
  59. Supertrapp: some signs of life at City Hall (24 September 1999)
  60. More "public participation" (16 September 1999)
  61. Unhooked from vouchers (7 September 1999)
  62. Good news about the Klan (20 August 1999)
  63. Another kind of respect (13 August 1999)
  64. Compromised Larkin? (6 August 1999)
  65. County Continues to Bail Out Gateway--this is news? (30 July 1999)
  66. Why are people poor? (23 July 1999)
  67. More on Reverse Commuter Blues (16 July 1999)
  68. North Coast Harbor project proposals: some sure things (9 July 1999)
  69. More happy talk, less Rokakis-bashing (18 June 1999)
  70. Scratch a Philadelphian, find a Clevelander (11 June 1999)
  71. ...and second prize is two weeks! (4 June 1999)
  72. There was no Cleveland pages of 28 May 1999.
  73. Chema admits it--Gateway's a loser (21 May 1999)
  74. Gateway broke; anyone surprised? (14 May 1999)
  75. Better than vouchers (7 May 1999)
  76. Help with income taxes! (30 April 1999)
  77. Remembering Perk (23 April 1999)
  78. Appraising Appraisals (16 April 1999)
  79. "Glory for Sale"--but who's buying? (9 April 1999)
  80. Reverse commuter blues (2 April 1999)
  81. A story about race (26 March 1999)
  82. How far we've come? (19 March 1999)
  83. There was no Cleveland pages of 12 March 1999.
  84. Cheap "Internet Journalism" at Channel 5 (5 March 1999)
  85. The Euclid Shuffle (26 February 1999)
  86. Sick of cheap reporting (19 February 1999)
  87. Equality in taxation (12 February 1999)
  88. Vice-President Voinovich? (5 February 1999)
  89. There was no Cleveland pages of 22 January 1999.
  90. Moran quits, and what's wrong with Council (22 January 1999)
  91. Everyday people, everyday traffic (15 January 1999)
  92. Jim WHO? (8 January 1999)
  93. The Cleveland Pages took a little holiday break.
  94. Judy on the Jennings (18 December 1998)
  95. There was no Cleveland pages of 11 December 1998.
  96. Coit Road shows some promise (4 December 1998)
  97. The Cleveland Pages took a long break. Hey, I don't get paid for this, okay?
  98. Merle Gordon on Ward 15 (6 November 1998)
  99. The new downtown plan hearing (30 October 1998)
  100. The new downtown plan, what's wrong (19 October 1998)
  101. Civic Vision 2000, the documents revealed! (16 October 1998)
  102. Civic Vision 2000, maybe some sunlight (9 October 1998)
  103. Another cut at the Civic Vision process (2 October 1998)
  104. Progress on vouchers (25 September 1998)
  105. Paying people to move away (18 September 1998)
  106. The payoff for Lerner? Nothing! (11 September 1998)
  107. Return of the Big Deal (5 September 1998)
  108. ¡Radio Libre Cleveland! (31 August 1998)
  109. The Public's Business (25 August 1998)
  110. BP moves out: the long term (14 August 1998)
  111. The Process Revolution (31 July 1998)
  112. STOP in the name of the law (24 July 1998)
  113. A new kind of redlining? (17 July 1998)
  114. Call your councilman--NOT! (27 February 1998)

This document's template was last modified
 on Wednesday, 09-Nov-2005 18:51:58 EST.
There is a new Cleveland Pages more or less every weekend.
The entire Cleveland Pages website is © 1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003
 by Mark W. Schumann, all rights reserved.
Copyrights belonging to others on individual items are noted.
Nobody else would take the credit or blame for these opinions anyway.

Go to the front page

Last validated 04 February 2000:

Go to Schumann Family welcome page [ Valid HTML 4.0! ] [ Valid CSS! ] [ Bobby Approved! ] [ Made with Cascading Style Sheets]

The W3C validator verifies that documents on this site conform to the Strict HTML 4.01 specification, which is a step towards consistency, accessibility, and interoperability.

Bobby checks for opportunities to improve access for users regardless of disabilities or special needs.